OHIO OVI LAW / OHIO DUI LAW
A BLOG dedicated to issues relating to Ohio OVI/DUI (Ohio Drunk Driving) charges.

This BLOG is posted and maintained by Jeffrey C. Meadows, Attorney at Law. Jeff's practice is dedicated to aggressively defending those accused of OVI/DUI in southwestern Ohio.  Specifically, Jeff fights in the following Courts: Hamilton County Municipal Court, Butler County Area Courts, Mason Municipal Court, Warren County Court, Clermont County Court, Fairfield Municipal Court, Lebanon Municipal Court, Middletown Municipal Court, Sharonville Mayor's Court and all of the other municipal and mayor's courts in Hamilton County, Butler County, Warren County and Clermont County.

JEFFREY C. MEADOWS, ATTORNEY AT LAW
8310 Princeton-Glendale Rd.
West Chester, OH 45069
(513) 777-2222 Tel.
(513) 870-5442 Fax.
Will the new Rules of Professional Conduct help Ohio OVI/DUI Defendants?
   At the begining of February, 2007,  the Ohio Supreme Court adopted new Rules of Professional Conduct.  While we attorneys have always had rules to govern our conduct, the "new rules" are much more specific and some go as far as spelling out "imperatives" for us to follow.
   
   It is this attorney's belief that new rule 3.1, which governs "Meritorious Claims and Contentions" places a duty on prosecutors not to assert an issue that doesn't have a basis in "fact."  How does this help OVI/DUI defendants? Quite simply put, if an investigation and arrest was preserved on video and the video clearly shows that the officer did not give the proper instructions or use the standardized procedures for the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (i.e., the HGN/eye test, the Walk & Turn, and the One-leg Stand), then the prosecutor, under Rule 3.1, may have a duty to agree that the test was not administered in "substantial compliance" with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's standardized procedures.

   So what happens if the prosecutor still tries to use the field tests against you?  Well, the "Scope" of the new Rules of Professional Conduct suggest that they may be subjecting themselves to sanctions.  But again, these rules are new and only time will tell if they truly have any implications to OVI/DUI cases or not.  
   
   And as previously stated, the position in this article is the opinion of the author and may not be shared by other attornesy (especially prosecutors)!  It is strongly encouraged that these issues be discussed with your OVI/DUI attorney to see if the Rules of Professional Conduct may have an impact on your Ohio DUI/Ohio OVI case.


MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 3/27/2007 10:50 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
2007 Advanced DUI Seminar
Thursday, March 8, 2007 and Friday, March 9, 2007 will be the dates for the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers annual DUI/OVI seminar.  The seminar is held in Columbus, Ohio and features speakers frrom across the country as well as some of Ohio's finest DUI lawyers /OVI lawyers.

Attendance at this seminar is a "must" for any attorney/lawyer who is truly interested in learning cutting edge techniques to fight a DUI/OVI.  Be sure to ask your DUI lawyer/ OVI lawyer if he/she will be attending (or has attended) this seminar. 

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 3/5/2007 5:10 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
IS IT IMPORTANT TO HAVE AN ATTORNEY WHOSE OFFICE IS IN THE SAME TOWN AS THE COURT?

 

            Local counsel can be beneficial, but is not essential!  The biggest benefit to local counsel is that they will know all of the little habits or pet peeves of the judge and prosecutor.  Examples: does the judge give jail days if you had an accident while drinking and driving or does the prosecutor have a “no deals” policy on breath test refusals, or does the judge deny occupational driving on refusals until the defendant pleads guilty.  These examples are generally known to local counsel or at least the attorneys who practice regularly in the court.  However, the most important qualification for your OVI / DUI attorney is that they not only know the court, but that they have all the knowledge and tools to properly assess and defend your OVI!

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 12/30/2006 3:23 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
SINCE I TOOK THE BREATH TEST, IS IT POSSIBLE TO FIGHT MY OVI / DUI?

 

            Absolutely!  However, not every attorney that is listed in the phone book under the DUI / OVI listing is competent to fight these cases.  As a matter of fact, many of the attorneys that list DUI / OVI cases in their Yellow Pages advertisement have never done a DUI / OVI / Drunk Driving trial.  Do you want someone representing you who has never had a trial? Do you want someone representing you who only knows how to say “GUILTY” or “No Contest?”

            Breath test cases are not easy to fight and they generally require the attorney to have a knowledge of the instrument that you blew into, familiarity with the Ohio Department of Health regulations that regulate the maintenance and use of the breath testing instrument, human anatomy and physiology and general trial skills.  Additionally, fighting an OVI / DUI with a blood, breath or urine result over 0.08 can be very time consuming and expensive.

            When choosing your OVI / DUI lawyer, make sure you ask them if they have ever done a DUI / OVI trial with a blood, breath or urine test admitted into evidence.

 

 

 

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 12/30/2006 3:20 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
WHY WAS I CHARGED WITH OVI / DUI WHEN I PASSED THE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS?

            Many people think they actually passed the field sobriety tests before they were arrested!  The problem is, most people who are taking the field sobriety tests are inexperienced in taking the tests and accordingly, have no idea what the officer is looking for.

            If the officer checks your eyes, simply being able to follow the pen (or their finger) doesn’t mean you passed the test.  What the officer is looking for is an involuntary twitch of the eyeball called nystagmus – specifically, Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN).

           

            Nystagmus is a condition that is checked for everyday in thousands of individuals and the HGN is usually administered by someone with much more schooling than a police officer – their called doctors!  Specifically, neurologists use this test on a daily basis to check patients for various neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease.  There are numerous substances that we ingest that can also cause nystagmus including nicotine, caffeine and of course, alcohol.  Specifically, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has told us that if a police officer gives this test using the specified procedures, it is a tool that can assist the officer in determining the likelihood of the test subject having a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.10 – specifically, there is a 77% chance that the person will test 0.10 or higher on a breath test machine (or blood or urine test). 

 

            The Walk & Turn test that was administered is another exercise used to assist the officer in knowing the likelihood of a subject testing 0.10.  Specifically, the officer should be trained to administer very specific instructions and then look for the following things:

                  1.      Suspect Cannot Keep His Balance While Listening To The Instructions

                           i.       Score this only if suspect does not maintain the heel-to-toe position throughout the instructions (feet must actually break apart)

                           ii.       Do not score this clue if suspect sways/uses his arms to balance himself, but maintains the heel-to-toe position

                  2.      Suspect Starts Before Instructions Are Finished

                  3.      Suspect Stop While Walking

                           i.       Record this clue if suspect pauses for several seconds

                           ii.       Do not record this clue if the suspect is merely walking slowly

                  4.      Suspect Does Not Touch Heel-to-Toe – gap between heel and toe must be more than ½ inch

                  5.      Suspect Steps Off The Line – at least one foot of the suspect must be entirely off the line

                  6.      Suspect Uses Arms To Balance – arm(s) must be raised more than 6 inches from sides for this clue

                  7.      Suspect Makes Improper Turn

                           i.       Suspect removes front foot from the line while turning

                           ii.       Suspect does not follow directions as demonstrated (i.e., spins or pivots around)

                  8.      Suspect Uses Incorrect Number of Steps – either more or fewer steps in either direction

 

            Again, NHTSA has indicated that if an officer observes two (2) or more of the preceding eight (8) indicators, there is a 68% chance the subject will test 0.10 or higher.

 

            The One-legged stand (OLS) is the 3rd test endorsed by NHTSA as a tool to be used to help officers determine the likelihood a subject will test 0.10.  The NHTSA guidelines instruct the officer to watch for the following:

 

                  1.      Suspect Sways While Balancing – side-to-side or back-and-forth motion while in one-leg stand position

                  2.      Suspect Uses Arms To Balance – arms must be raised more than 6 inches from sides to count this clue

                  3.      Suspect Hopping (to maintain balance) –resorts to hopping in order to maintain balance

                  4.      Suspect Puts Foot Down – not able to maintain one-leg position, but puts foot down one or more times during 30 second count

 

            As you may suspect, NHTSA tells us that if the proper instructions are administered, if an officer sees 2 of the preceding 4 indicators, there is a 65% likelihood the subject will test 0.10 or higher. 

 

            Your OVI / DUI attorney should be familiar with the NHTSA standardized procedures and criteria and know how to effectively challenge these tests in court.  Even if the judge says these tests are admissible at trial, a competent OVI attorney / DUI attorney should know how to deal with these tests in front of a jury (so long as the client was literally “falling down drunk”).

 

 

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 12/30/2006 3:19 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
What is a "Physical Control" charge?

   What does “Physical Control” mean?  Ohio’s Physical Control Statute, O.R.C. 4511.194, became effective on 1/1/05.  Physical Control is similar to an Ohio OVI/Ohio DUI charge in that it deals with being in a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs of abuse with one exception, Physical Control does not require that the vehicle have ever been driven or even started.

 

   The best example of a Physical Control violation is the person who staggers out of the tavern and decides to “sleep it off” in their vehicle.  Often times what happens is the person starts the car, either to run the air conditioner or the heater, so the vehicle is actually running, then goes to sleep.  However, one need not have the car running or even have the keys in the ignition in order to be in violation of O.R.C. 4511.194 – Physical Control.  Under the statute, having the keys within reach will satisfy the definition of having “physical control.”   The physical control statute was essentially designed to “reward” or rather, not punish as severely, the person who drinks too much (or uses drugs of abuse) and then gets into their car, but decides not to actually drive.  

   For a list of the attorneys in your area that can help you defend a physical control charge, check out the Attorney Directory at www.OVILAW.com.

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 11/6/2006 2:00 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
Can my charge be reduced to a Reckless Operation?

   There is an overwhelming opinion amongst the general public (or maybe just the drinking public) that a first offense Ohio OVI / DUI should be, or at least can be, reduced to a reckless operation charge.  Can this really happen?  Well, it depends in large part on a number of things, including, but not limited to:

 

1.                  The prosecutor’s attitude toward OVI / DUI charges;

2.                  The Court (or Judge’s) attitude toward OVI / DUI charges;

3.                  The actual facts of your case, including such facts as:

a.       Was there a breath test performed and if so, how high (or low) was the result;

b.      Was there an accident or bad driving; and

c.       Where you polite and cooperative to the arresting officer.

 

   These are but a few of the many considerations that will be considered when the prosecutor and your OVI attorney / DUI attorney sit down to discuss the possible out come at a pre-trial conference.   This is not to say that if you had a low breath test and you were polite and cooperative that it guarantees a reduction of your charge, in fact, many courts (or prosecutors) take a “no reduction” or “zero tolerance” approach with OVI / DUI charges. As a matter of fact, some prosecutors will "reduce" an OVI /DUI if the defendant refused to do a breath test because they don't know whether they are reducing a case where the person would have blown a 0.20 or a 0.02.  Does this mean you should always do a breath test?  My answer is NO!  You should ALWAYS ask to talk to an attorney who knows OVI / DUI defense before willingly taking a breath, blood or urine test.

    Since the reduction policy of each court and/or prosecutor may vary, 
it is important to find an attorney who is familiar with the court and prosecutor that you will be facing in your OVI / DUI case.  For a list of attorneys who handle these cases in the court that you will be going to, check out the Attorney Directory on www.OVILAW.com.

 

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 11/6/2006 1:51 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
Drugged driving laws having little effect on court dockets

On August 17, 2006, Ohio's DUI law underwent it's "umpteenth-billion" change.  This time the change included "per se" limits for certain drugs that can be found in blood or urine.  Some of the drugs are legal (with prescriptions) and some are not.  But the fact remains that some of these drugs can remain in your system LONG after the substances quit effecting our brains and accordingly, our ability to operate motor vehicles.

Despite the change however, the number of cases that have been filed under this updated version of the Ohio DUI/ Ohio OVI law has remained extremely low.  See the June 6, 2006 post for the substances and actual levels listed in the new law.

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 10/31/2006 9:14 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
OVILAW.COM is quickly becoming THE spot to find out everything you need to know about DUI, OVI or DRUNK DRIVING in Ohio.

WWW.OVILAW.com is quickly becoming the spot to find everything you need to know about DUI, drunk driving, OVI charges in Ohio.  WWW.OVILAW.com has almost every municipal and county court listed (searchable by county) with a "click here" to get directions to the court.  WWW.OVILAW.com also has over 500 Ohio law enforcement agencies listed (by county) so the attorney members can access important information about the agencies who are issuing OVI citations. Finally, the list of attorneys who handle OVI, DUI, drunk driving cases is growing and again, is searchable by county on the ATTORNEY DIRECTORY

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 8/25/2006 7:43 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks
Portable Breath Tests are "Inherently unreliable" but that's good enough for government work!
   This past week, the 4th District Court of Appeals in Ohio published a decision which addressed the admissibility of the PBT (portable breath test - aka, the hand-held breath test).  The defendant in State v. Shuler, 2006-Ohio-4336, wanted to admit the PBT result that showed he was under the illegal limit (it showed .078) and the trial judge said NO!  Defendant entered a no contest plea then appealed the issue.  The 4th District held that they have always allowed the test result to be admitted for purposes of "probable cause to arrest" but they could never consent to it being admitted at trial because it is "inherently unreliable."  That's right, 3 court of appeals judges unanimously agreed that a device they called INHERENTLY UNRELIABLE can be considered for probable cause to arrest!!!  Specifically, they said "PBT results are considered inherently unreliable because they ''may register an inaccurate percentage of alcohol in the breath, and may also be inaccurate as to the presence or absence of any alcohol at all.''"   

Is anyone out there as amazed as I?  I find it absolutely amazing that a court can allow ANY evidence to be admitted if it is INHERENTLY UNRELIABLE, no matter what type of hearing it's for.  Is this decision telling us there is a different standard for the State than for Defendants? 

MORE >>
Posted by jmeadows7 at 8/25/2006 7:24 PM | View Comments | Add Comment | Trackbacks